Jane Eyre

10210I care for myself. The more solitary, the more friendless, the more unsustained I am, the more I will respect myself.” 

Author: Charlotte Brontë
Category: Classics
Pages: 507
Publication Date: 1847

Buddy read with Melanie!

Want to read this book? Use one of the links below to support the blog!

Amazon — Barnes & Noble — Book Depository

This is absolutely a book that all young women should read. This is a story of self-respect and enduring emotionally trying times by maintaining rational decisions which are lessons that I think everyone, but especially young girls, need to be reminded of at times.

First, I can’t emphasize enough how profound this book is for its time (and probably why it was despised by many at the time of its publication). Jane Eyre was originally published in 1847. This is one of the many periods in history where the biggest achievement a woman make is to marry well and one of the most qualifying characteristics a woman could have was to be pretty.

Enter Jane Eyre. Orphaned as an infant and sent to live with an uncle who loved her and an aunt who found her burdensome. After her uncle’s death, the aunt takes on a whole evil step-mother persona and treats Jane as a lesser human. One of the most profound moments in this part of the story is when some servants make the comment that they would sympathize more with Jane if only she were prettier.

I would think that a book that is over 150 years old would be past the statute of limitations on spoilers but just in case there is someone that has not read it, I will specifically state any of the major developments in the book.

That said, in the broadest of terms, Jane, despite not being pretty, is later in the position of being able to make an astoundingly good marriage considering her situation. According to contemporary thought, this is a wonderful fortune for Jane. However, in order to do so she would have to abandon her own sense of right and wrong.

There were just so many moments where I was so proud of Jane for making the decisions she did because I know how hard it is to separate yourself from emotional moments in order to make decisions that actually make sense.

I actually first read this book about 2 years ago and I loved then. This time around though, I noticed a few things that I didn’t before.

First was a little bit of anti-Christian sentiment.

This book was not hard-line anti-religion. More it took issue with some ideas. Most important of which, I felt, was the idea that if someone does you wrong to just completely let it go because eventually you will be dead and in Heaven so it won’t matter to you anyway. There is something to be said for forgiving those that have wronged you but I felt like this book was standing up to the idea of just letting it go completely and acting like nothing happened because that is ultimately the easy way out. The idea that suffering makes you a better person.

Also, I noticed how incredibly selfish Mr. Rochester is. I don’t know why I didn’t notice this so much before but it really stuck out to me now. Every time he tried to justify himself I just rolled my eyes at him.

For me this book is less about the romance and more about the importance of strength of character. Of being able to be proud of yourself, to respect yourself. It is natural to seek love and acceptance and searching for those things that were denied to her in her childhood was something that shaped Jane, but she refused to compromise her own moral compass to achieve it.

Absolutely a recommended read for anyone that likes classics. The only reason it did not get a perfect 10/10  for me was that I felt like it got wordy and went on a little long at times and I felt myself getting a little bored waiting for something to happen.

Rating:

9-loved it!

Amazon — Barnes & Noble — Book Depository

Twitter — Facebook — Instagram

 

7 responses

    • Thank YOU for giving me such a great excuse to read and reread all these books! Feels like the classics go on the backburner too easily. :)

      Liked by 2 people

    • Thank you! I do hope you enjoy it. I am curious though, what do you mean when you said you find it distasteful for people to enjoy classics?

      Liked by 1 person

      • I never found the joy in reading a classic, maybe a few but not alot. It took a higher calibre of understanding for me to read one so just abandoned classics, but i do belive they are great and i would read one now rather than then.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ah yeah they are a very different reading experience than more modern books. Even the language can be more complex so reading it takes more focus at times. I like a lot of Jane Austen and I plan on reading more by the Bronte sisters but stuff like Jules Verne is just waaaay too boring (imo) for me to be able to get past the complexity of the sentences. I hated classics when I was in middle and high school but since college I started loving them. The right books at the right time maybe. 🙂

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: